'Brief Psychoanalysis of A Perfect Day for Bananafish Essay\r'

'J. D. Salinger’s A Perfect Day for Bananafish eviscerates the psychological struggles of Seymour Glass, a veteran of the Second World War. Through Freudian psychoanalysis, the different aspects of the effects of his struggle-damaged psyche on his office to perform in society become clear. in that respect are several instances during which it becomes obvious that Seymour’s superego does non function in the same manner as that of the adults around him. It is also evident that his id is the most preponderating force for his unusual behavior, but not by the pleasure principle.\r\nRather, it is the childlike innocence that is the facet of his id that is the unproblematic motivation for him to act the way he does. Fin bothy, in the ending, Seymour’s ego comes to the conclusion that it is simply hopeless for him to buy the farm into the materialistic society that has come to be. Thus, it quite a little be seen that the fight and the society that Seymour retu rns to after the war play equally important roles in stellar(a) up to his suicide. Seymour’s dysfunctional superego becomes evident during Muriel’s conversation with her mother. The mentions of his implements regarding â€Å"The trees.\r\nThat business with the window. Those horrible issues he say to Granny about her plans for passing away. What he did with all those lovely pictures from Bermuda. ” all period to various actions that delegate that Seymour’s sense of right and wrong-which is associated with the superego-does not separate the distinction in the midst of things that are socially bankable and things that are not. Furthermore, it is also implied that this damage to his psychological soil stems from the war, which may be a sign of express Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).\r\nOf course, PTSD was unhearable of during this time period, so Seymour remained untreated for it. This defective superego is thence unable to contest the id proper ly. As a result, Seymour’s id is given partial freedom and so he acts childishly, making things up and pointing things out that are considered foolish. unrivaled such use is when he asks Sybil whether â€Å"Whirly Wood, Connecticut is anywhere near Whirly Wood, Connecticut. ” In fact, the entirety of his interaction with Sybil is an example of the uncontrolled id.\r\nAlong with his invented bananafish, this serves to illustrate that his innocence is the primary(a) reason for how he acts. However, this leads to an irreconcilable difference between Seymour and the light of society, as the rest of society is generally dictated by their superego. This is best portrayed by the events mentioned in passing during Muriel’s conversation with her mother, and the thing he tells the woman in the elevator: â€Å"I see you’re looking at my feet. Whether or not the woman was actually looking at his feet at all is obviously unimportant; the abbreviated exchange b etween Seymour and the unnamed woman serves to depict the rift between Seymour and the rest of the world. This rift lastly leads Seymour’s ego, which is tasked with the interaction with external stimuli, to the conclusion that he can no longer coexist with the rest of society. As a result, the only course of action that he can see is that of suicide.\r\nThus, both WWII and the physicalism of the society left in WWII’s airstream are equally responsible for Seymour’s death. Had the war not damaged Seymour’s psyche to the point where his superego could no longer oppose his id, the whole serial publication of events would not have taken place to stupefy with. Had society not been converted to follow the ideals of materialism, Seymour would not have found that he was unable to fit into society. But because both did what they did, Seymour’s death became an natural result of the combination of events that culminated here.\r\n'